When most of us shop for clothes, we don’t think about government policy. We’re busy looking at fabric, fit, and price tags. But behind the scenes, tariffs – essentially taxes on imported goods – play a huge role in what we pay for our jeans, sneakers, or even that “going out top” from Zara.
Fashion relies heavily on global supply chains, and the United States imports the vast majority of its clothing, footwear, and accessories. That’s why tariffs hit this industry especially hard. According to the American Apparel & Footwear Association – Fashion Tariffs 101, fashion makes up only 5% of total U.S. imports but accounts for more than 25% of all tariff revenue. That imbalance shapes everything from sourcing strategies to consumer prices.
In this post, we’ll break down what tariffs really mean for fashion, why they matter to both brands and consumers, and how they create ripple effects far beyond the checkout line.
Tariffs are essentially import taxes. When an American brand sources shoes from Vietnam or a jacket from Bangladesh, the government charges a fee: sometimes small, sometimes surprisingly steep. These charges are built into the Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS), which assigns tax rates to categories of goods.
The kicker? For fashion, those rates are much higher than average.
The effective tariff rate on apparel and footwear is more than five times higher than the U.S. average for all imports.
Outdated tariff laws, some written decades ago, still govern how fashion goods are taxed today.
The result is a hidden tax that brands can’t escape, and that consumers end up paying.
Tariffs don’t just sit on paper — they shape how much we pay at the register. Here’s how the costs ripple:
Import & sourcing costs rise
Every extra tariff increases the base cost of a garment or pair of shoes before it ever hits a store.
Brands adjust margins
Some absorb part of the cost to keep shoppers happy, but most pass it on.
Retail prices creep up
That $80 pair of sneakers might suddenly be $95 with no difference in quality, just tariffs.
Consumer demand gets squeezed
When prices rise across categories, shoppers often cut back. That puts added pressure on brands already navigating inflation and competition.
In fact, a Vogue Business survey found that 70% of fashion companies reported higher sourcing costs and tighter margins due to tariffs, and nearly half said they’d seen sales dip as a result.
One of the strangest and most unfair quirks in U.S. tariff policy is the so-called “pink tariff.” It’s the name for a frustrating reality: women’s clothing and footwear are taxed at higher rates than men’s equivalents.
The average tariff rate on women’s apparel is about 3% higher than men’s.
In 2018 alone, that gap translated into women paying an extra $2 billion at the register.
Examples include overcoats and shoes — men’s versions carry a lower rate even though they’re essentially the same item.
This hidden surcharge feels like an extension of the “pink tax” that already plagues consumer goods like razors and shampoo. It disproportionately affects women, especially those in lower-income brackets, and it highlights how outdated trade codes create inequities no one asked for.
Congress recently introduced the Pink Tariffs Study Act, requiring the Treasury Department to formally examine these gender gaps. But for now, women are still footing the higher bill.
The “pink tariff” means women’s clothing is taxed at higher rates than men’s, costing women billions more each year.
Tariffs are considered regressive, meaning they take up a larger share of income from people with less money to spare. Clothing and shoes are essentials — everyone needs them, but lower-income families spend a much higher percentage of their budgets on these items.
So when tariffs drive up prices, the impact lands harder on those who can least afford it. A few dollars here or there might not register with high earners, but for families living paycheck to paycheck, the cost adds up fast.
Tariffs don’t just affect consumers — they force brands to rethink entire supply chains.
Sourcing shifts: Many companies are reducing reliance on China and moving production to Southeast Asia, Central America, or Africa.
Operational headaches: Switching suppliers means renegotiating contracts, retraining workers, and ensuring new factories meet standards.
Uncertainty: With tariffs changing depending on trade wars or political agendas, fashion companies face constant unpredictability.
For big brands like Nike or H&M, adapting is possible (if costly). For smaller labels, tariff-driven changes can be devastating.
Programs like the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA) and Haiti HOPE/HELP give certain imports tariff-free or reduced-duty access to the U.S. market. These agreements help brands keep costs down and support jobs in developing countries.
But here’s the catch: many of these programs are temporary and face regular renewal battles in Congress. If they expire, both fashion companies and foreign workers could face major consequences.
Tariffs have social, ethical, and cultural consequences too:
Job insecurity abroad: In countries where garment exports are the backbone of the economy, tariffs put millions of jobs at risk.
Stalled progress on sustainability: Brands under financial pressure often cut back on sustainable materials or fair labor investments.
Market distortions: Outdated tariff codes create inefficiencies and inequities, like the pink tariff.
Things need to change. Here’s how policy and industry could ease the burden:
Modernize tariff codes to reflect today’s fashion landscape.
Eliminate the pink tariff through gender-neutral classifications.
Extend trade preference programs like AGOA.
Increase transparency so consumers understand how tariffs shape costs.
Incentivize sustainable and domestic production where feasible.
Shipping containers and trade trends illustrate how U.S. tariffs affect imports, exports, and ultimately consumer costs. Source: The University of Virginia
The future of tariffs in fashion depends on how policymakers act. If outdated tariff codes persist, we’ll likely continue to see higher prices, distorted markets, and inequities. If reforms happen — like modernized codes, extended preference programs, and gender-neutral tariff rates — the industry could move toward a fairer, more balanced system.
Either way, the effects will be felt in something as everyday as our clothes. Fashion may seem like it’s about trends and aesthetics, but it’s also a mirror of global politics, economics, and justice.
Tariffs might seem invisible when we’re swiping a card or checking out online, but their impact is everywhere. They shape supply chains, inflate prices, and, in cases like the pink tariff, unfairly burden women. They hit hardest on low-income families and disrupt jobs in developing economies.
Fashion isn’t just fabric and design. It’s also policy, economics, and power — stitched right into the seams. So the next time you wonder why your sneakers cost $15 more than last year, remember: tariffs might be the reason.
American Apparel & Footwear Association. (n.d.). Fashion tariffs 101. Retrieved September 28, 2025, from https://www.aafaglobal.org/tariffs
Vogue Business. (2025, August 29). Where tariffs stand now. Retrieved from https://www.voguebusiness.com/story/consumers/where-tariffs-stand-now
ODI. (2025, April 10). Pink tariffs: worse for women?. Retrieved from https://odi.org/en/insights/pink-tariffs-worse-for-women-are-trumps-new-tariffs-gender-biased/
Cornell ILR. (2025, April 7). Q&A: Tariff impacts on apparel workers & fashion industry. Retrieved from https://www.ilr.cornell.edu/news/public-impact/qa-tariff-impacts-apparel-workers-and-fashion-industry
Business of Fashion. (2025, July 9). What Trump’s latest tariff threats mean for fashion. Retrieved from https://www.businessoffashion.com/articles/retail/what-trumps-latest-tariff-threats-mean-for-fashion